Sunday, August 19, 2007
Anxiety - What is an Anxiety Symptom?
A Silent Epidemic among Children
Friday, August 17, 2007
The Use Of Modern Air Purifiers In Today's Home
Tuesday, August 14, 2007
New Nanoparticle Could Provide Simple Early Diagnosis Of Many Diseases
Most people think of hydrogen peroxide as a topical germ killer, but the medicine cabinet staple is gaining steam in the medical community as an early indicator of disease in the body.
The nanoparticle polymer is made of peroxalate esters. A fluorescent dye (pentacene) is then encapsulated into the polymer. When the nano particles bump into hydrogen peroxide, they excite the dye, which then emits photons (or light) that can be detected (Credit: Image courtesy of Georgia Institute of Technology)
Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University researchers are the first to create a nanoparticle capable of detecting and imaging trace amounts of hydrogen peroxide in animals. The nanoparticles, thought to be completely nontoxic, could some day be used as a simple, all-purpose diagnostic tool to detect the earliest stages of any disease that involves chronic inflammation — everything from cancer and Alzheimer’s to heart disease and arthritis.
The research, lead by the laboratories of Niren Murthy at the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University and Dr. Robert Taylor in the Division of Cardiology at the Emory University School of Medicine, will appear in the October issue of Nature Materials and was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Hydrogen peroxide is thought to be over-produced by cells at the early stages of most diseases. Because there were previously no imaging techniques available to capture this process in the body, the details of how the hydrogen peroxide is produced and its role in a developing disease must still be determined.
The Georgia Tech and Emory nanoparticles may be the key to better understanding the role of hydrogen peroxide in the progression of many diseases and later play an important diagnostic role, Murthy said.
“These nanoparticles are incredibly sensitive so you can detect nanomolar concentrations of hydrogen peroxide. That’s important because researchers aren’t yet certain what amounts of hydrogen peroxide are present in various diseases,” Murthy said.
The ultimate goal, however, is that the nanoparticles could some day be used as a simple, all-purpose diagnostic tool for most diseases. In the future, the nanoparticle would be injected by needle into a certain area of the body (for instance, the heart). If the nanoparticles encountered hydrogen peroxide, they would emit light. Should a doctor see a significant amount of light activity in the area, the doctor would know that the patient may be presenting early signs of a disease in that area of the body.
The Georgia Tech and Emory nanoparticles penetrate deep tissue and operate at a high wave length, making them sensitive indicators of the presence of hydrogen peroxide produced by any sort of inflammation.
The nanoparticle polymer is made of peroxalate esters. A fluorescent dye (pentacene) is then encapsulated into the polymer. When the nano particles bump into hydrogen peroxide, they excite the dye, which then emits photons (or light) that can be detected in a simple, photon-counting scan.
“It’s using this nanoparticle made of peroxalate esters that allows you to do this three component reaction in vivo. If you were to inject a peroxalate ester and a dye, they would go their own ways once in the body. With the nanoparticles, we can sequester both of these reagents within nanometers of each other, in vivo,” Murthy said.
The goal was to maximize the wavelength of the particles. Wavelength determines the sensitivity in vivo. And if the particle’s wavelength is high enough, it can penetrate the skin and display clearly on a scan.
The research team started with a nanoparticle that was made of dye and filled with peroxide esthers. They later realized that the reverse (a particle made of peroxalate esters and filled with dye) was more effective at imaging hydrogen peroxide, Murthy said.
The group will conduct further tests with the nanoparticles to confirm their safety and effectiveness.
Sunday, July 15, 2007
How to effectively use voice recognition for patient documentation
If you don’t already own a copy of voice recognition software, you probably know someone who does. Some have had great experiences with it, MOST have not. Why?
Voice Recognition Software has come a long way since the early IBM Via Voice and Dragon Naturally Speaking days. But is it there yet? Is it ready to be the documentation solution that you’ve been waiting for all these years? It just might be.
Voice recognition software has been around for longer than you think. Try 1970. It’s sort of one of those technologies that everyone has been waiting for 30 years but it just never really got finished. Like alternative energy cars. However the advancements made in this technology over the past 10 years have been remarkable and more and more products coming to market these days are equipped with voice activation ie. Cell Phones, Cars.
So what does this all mean for healthcare professionals and there endless amounts of paper work? The technology is mature enough to revolutionize your documentation, however it is not for the faint of heart. Do not expect to be able to go to your local computer store pick up a copy of Dragon Naturally Speaking and be able to dictate that 10 page report that night. Your success will be based on these three factors:
Hardware – A powerful computer and a digital quality microphone (usually USB) is your first step to starting out on the right foot. Your computer should be at least a 1 GHz and should have 512MB RAM. A headset microphone or digital array microphone is your best bet. If you’re thinking about using a Tablet PC, Motion Computing’s M1400 has a built-in microphone that works very well.
Training – The reality 9 out of 10 people will not go home and read the entire users manual to learn all the features that the software has to offer. Training from someone who is experienced in using the software is a great way to go. An hour or two will go a long way in getting a good voice profile setup.
Practice – Expect to spend at least 5-10 hours of learning the features, training your profile, making corrections and getting comfortable with using it from day to day.
Taking these simple steps should get you to a level where you will favor voice recognition over typing, and it’s only up from there. The end result of the development of this technology will be a universal profile that will achieve extremely high accuracy with no training at all, meaning anyone can just pick up the microphone and use it. This will then allow for the development of real-time language translators (already in the works).
Saturday, June 23, 2007
EMR Benefits in a Urology Practice
An interview article by John Deutsch describing his experience with A.I.med, an EMR and practice management product by Acrendo Medical Software
Electronic Medical Records has been a popular topic of discussion throughout the healthcare industry, with extensive pressure from the government for physicians to convert to EMR. However, there has been little concrete data on the actual return physicians will receive on their investment. The percentage of small private practices who have implemented EMR is still below 10%. Dr. Moez Khorsandi, a urologist in Los Angeles made the leap to EMR and comments that he would “never go back to paper”. The following is an interview between John Deutsch of Acrendo Medical Software and Dr. Khorsandi.
John: “Dr. Khorsandi, how did you reach the decision to purchase an EMR?”
Dr. Khorsandi: “Two reasons John, no. 1 was that handwriting became so painful for me that I had to find an alternative method to charting my notes, and no. 2 was I needed to improve the profitability of my practice. The potential of EMR was obvious to me but I was skeptical and wondered whether the $10K to $15K dollar investment would be worth the risk.”
John: “What key features were you looking for in an EMR?”
Dr. Khorsandi: “Efficiency was my no.1 priority. In order for EMR to successfully work in my practice it had to be easy to use, and robust enough to keep up with me, even when I see up to 10 patients per hour. Before I went with Acrendo, I looked at multiple products, many of which were very point and click intensive. Most of my patient visits are routine and I needed a system that would allow me to move quickly from screen to screen and a system that would allow me to create customized EMR templates. I was also concerned about the support we would receive from the company I chose. I felt the implementation process would be challenging and I needed a company that would be there for us when we needed help. Acrendo has always provided that high level of help.”
John: “How has EMR helped you save time?”
Dr. Khorsandi: “EMR has greatly reduced my overall charting time by reducing the redundant data entry. As a specialist, I often have to write duplicate notes – one for my own records and another for the primary care physician. A.I.med’s EMR has eliminated this problem completely.”
John: “How has EMR helped increase your revenues and profitability in an industry facing deep reimbursement cuts?”
Dr. Khorsandi: “EMR has integrated with my billing system by pushing the CPT/ICD-9 codes from my notes to the billing system in real-time. This has resulted in more accurate and timely billing. Documentation is much more accurate and accessible to every user in the system. Providing proof of documentation to insurance companies is now very fast and easy as well.”
John: “How has EMR helped improve your quality of care?”
Dr. Khorsandi: “For starters, we don’t have to look for charts anymore. There has been a significant improvement in the quality of patient care. And by having quick access to medical records, it gives us the ability to have patients’ information at our fingertips within seconds from any computer.”
John: “How long did it take you to achieve a 100% Return on Investment?”
Dr. Khorsandi: “Even with a small practice, a relatively low number of daily patient visits and buying the necessary hardware I have seen a 100% ROI in approximately 12 months.”
John: “What challenges did you experience during the implementation phase?”
Dr. Khorsandi: “Scanning in our old records was a big hurdle.”
John: “If you had to do it all over again what would you do differently?”
Dr. Khorsandi: “Nothing”
A.I.med by Acrendo Software is a state-of-the-art Practice Management and Electronic Medical Record software system. Designed with the small-medium size practice in mind, A.I.med is both affordable and easy-to-use. A.I.med’s award winning “back-end” allows for real-time customization and is designed for Windows 2000 and XP. Based in Southern California, Acrendo Software boasts a 100% client retention rate as a result of their excellent support and products.
Monday, April 16, 2007
EMR Article - Tablet PCs and Electronic Medical Records
Which is the best Tablet PC for physicians? What is the difference between slate-style and convertible-style Tablet PC's? How long is the battery life? What type of CPU is best? Will using a tablet improve my quality of care?
Tablet PC's are the hottest technology in the world of Electronic Medical Records and truly deliver on their promise to provide physicians with an electronic solution for their patient charts. Here are some answers to some of the most common questions regarding Tablet PC's.
Which is better: Slate or Convertible style Tablet PC's?
Tablet PC's come in 2 styles, the slate-style and the convertible-style. The primary difference is that the convertible-style comes equipped with a built-in keyboard while the slate style does not. Using a slate-style Tablet PC requires the user to use the stylus/digitizer pen as the primary user interface. If a keyboard is needed the Tablet PC must be connected to a docking station connected to a keyboard. While the convertible still has full Tablet PC capabilities like hand-writing recognition, speech recognition and mobility, convertible-style Tablet PC's tend to be thicker and heavier as their keyboard is simply unnecessary weight when being used in Tablet PC mode; this weight difference is usually about 1-2 pounds. In most cases the slate-style Tablet PC is a better choice as it is lighter (usually 3.5 lbs), easier to carry and offers more advanced features. However if you think you will be using the Tablet PC out of the office, or need to frequently use a keyboard the convertible is a more robust option.
How do Tablet PC's connect to my network?
Almost all Tablet PC's these days come equipped with built-in wireless networking. In order for a Tablet PC to send or receive data from your Electronic Medical Record Software in real time you must be connected to a wireless network. In order to do this you will need a Wireless Access Point which will enable you to connect the Tablet PC(s) wirelessly to your wired network. A high quality Wireless Access Point should be purchased as its proper functioning will be a major determining factor in how well your network performs. Business-quality access points from Cisco, 3COM, NetGear, D-Link are all good options and generally cost between $150-$400.
What type of CPU is best for Tablet PC’s?
Tablet PC's come equipped with two types of CPUs, the Intel Celeron and the Intel Centrino w/ Pentium M technology. While the Celeron is significantly less expensive, it lacks some of the important features that come with the Centrino including integrated wireless, faster performance, improved stability and advanced power-saving controls. The wireless chipset included with the Centrino platform are generally high-quality wireless cards that function in both 802.11b and 802.11g environments. In a physician office setting, heavy use of the wireless is expected so picking a Tablet PC with good wireless capabilities is very important.
How long is the battery life on a Tablet PC?
Battery life ranges from 2 hours to 6 hours depending on the model. While many of the Tablet PC manufacturers claim to have higher battery life they often do not take into account how the Tablet PC is being used. For example, the built-in wireless networking can suck up a lot of battery life as do large applications such as Electronic Medical Records Software. Even under these circumstances almost all Tablet PCs have a minimum battery life of 2 hours and some of the Tablet PC's by Motion, HP, Fujitsu and Electrovaya can achieve consistent battery life of over 3.5 hours under heavy use.
How can Tablet PCs help physicians deliver better patient care?
Tablet PC's provide physicians with an endless amount of information right at their finger tips. This translates into better patient care because the physician can access a more thorough patient record, access patient education databases, access medication databases to aid in prescription of medications, document at the point of encounter and send prescriptions/lab requests electronically using a more secure, less error prone method of transmission.
Which Tablet PCs are best for use in physician offices?
While there is no clear choice when it comes to purchasing a Tablet PC there are 3 models that have become very popular among physicians and are generally good choices. The new Motion LE1600 Tablet PC by Motion Computing and Fujitsu ST5000 Tablet PC by Fujitsu are arguably the best Slate-Style Tablet PC's on the market; both range between $2000-$2500. The Toshiba Portege is a great option as a convertible Tablet PC. The new Acer C200 and IBM Thinkpad Tablet PC's are also great convertible-style options.